What will the homosexual pairs produce?

I do not know whether it was necessary to write on this subject or not, but one thing is known when some people unite to harm the religion and society, then Krishna also tells Arjun that get up dear and aim through the bow. In the past, 5 members of the Supreme Court Constitution Bench rejected the 158-year-old section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, according to which to create unnatural sex with mutual consent is no more crime. The court said that this provision violates the right of equality provided in the Constitution. With this decision of the Supreme Court, India became the 26th country where unnatural sex would be accepted.

Actually, if homosexuality is described in clear words then to make a relationship of a man with a man and to make a relationship of a woman with a woman is homosexuality. In India, in the year 1861, section 377 was created by the Britishers under which homosexuality or unnatural sex was seen as a criminal offense. But now it has got judicial approval and gradually social acceptance will also be obtained.

We all know that nature has made women and men as complementary to each other. Physical relationships created between the two gives birth to a new life, the next generation. Now, the homosexual people will give birth to what, that perhaps you can understand well. If you see, most of the people who are demanding for sexual relations today are young. These people are fighting for their enjoyment or fulfillment of their mental bliss. But tomorrow, when these people will be getting older than where will they go, who will help them, who will take care of them? Of course, they will increase the burden on the society or the government. And the children of civil society will have to are bear the burden of their unnatural habits. Then will it not come under the category of crime, will it not be considered a crime? After all, who will answer these questions, have you seen any oral spokesperson of the homosexual community is standing?

Some people might be wondering how would this affects the society, each one is born with its own mentality. Those who are thinking this way, do not know that this entire development is not just the judicial tale of modern India but is also a part of a thought-provoking policy to attack Indian culture. Born in Chennai in 1957, Anjali Gopalan, who grew up in the US, laid the foundation of the institution named the Naz Foundation in 1995. Initially, the organization's work was to care for and support the people with HIV, but after six years of its establishment, the Naz Foundation started showing its true colors and raised the issue of gay sex for the first time in Delhi High Court in 2001 and after all it has got success in his original aim.

The institution and the modern intellectuals associated with it argue that when there was no such thing as society, civilization, in the primitive era, homosexual relations were considered very common. Even today, many of the tribal tribes of the world are engaged in homosexuality without any interference. If this is the argument, then we should be ashamed of whether we are in the 21st century today or in the primitive civilization, that we are accepting such things? After all, what development did we arrive at, is it not that due to the personal, mental, and physical pleasures- some people have brought us from the modern times to the primitive era? After all, the ancient uneducated civilization is being compared to today's educated civilization. Whether it is necessary or is it the compulsion, who will answer this question?

Today, some people are trying to explain with some stories of Indian history and mythological texts that it is a part of Indian culture, as some intellectuals linked Mahadev Shiva's ‘Ardhanashirvara’ with the analogy, then someone linked the siren of mythical narrative-Mohini of Vishnu to seduce Lord Shiva with unnatural ties. It is being proved by taking a few fairytale stories that as if Indian civilization has been gathering around unnatural relations since time immemorial. If that was so, why did Rishi Vatsyaan consider this as a completely taboo in Kamasutra and showed it as a crisis for health, but the examples of Vedic period seem to be strained by these adopted sons of western civilizations?

Whereas, according to research, in fact, about 75 percent of gay people were found to be victims of depression and sadness. Apart from these, fear of suicide, substance abuse, and relationship problems are also created in this, it is a disease for which the center of treatment was to be made, this disease itself was made a part of the society. Marriage is a moral act between a man and a woman, which is created by society and is carried forward with the laws of nature. The purpose of marriage in society is to make a physical relationship and extend the human civilization. Here is the law of nature which has been running for centuries. But gay weddings or sexual intervention disrupts the rule of this human chain made itself by God. In natural weddings, women give birth to a child while in same-sex marriage, naturally, a couple cannot produce a child.

Is it not clearly a mental illness? As an example, see, just recently a few people in Haryana's Mewat region had taken a goat to sexually satisfy their desires. This was told by civil society and legal system as beyond tolerance. If there are 10 to 20 such issues coming out regularly and an institution standing in its favor, and it is demanded that it is the right of human beings, their way of living, so will it also be legally recognized? What will happen then? Will society and law accept this in the name of modernity? If yes, then what will be the role of religion, law, and society which helps man to become a human? Exceptions and crimes have been happening in all times and ages, but it is not necessary that they should be brought under the category of human rights.

vinay arya